Oakland City Council may decide July 5 whether to place measure on November ballot
By Post Staff
Oakland community leaders and activists, port workers and environmental advocates joined City Councilmember Noel Gallo on the steps of City Hall this week to urge the City Council to allow the public to vote on the use of public funds for the A’s stadium and private real estate development at Howard Terminal.
“We’re here to commit to the residents of Oakland that they must have a right to vote on whether to spend over a billion public dollars (on the proposal) for the Oakland A’s to build a stadium and real estate development at Howard Terminal,” said Gallo, speaking at the media event Wednesday morning.
“This is an unprecedented grab of public funds,” which could grow considerably because there seems to be no limit on the city’s liability for potential cost overruns, Gallo said.
“We have to learn from our past experiences (with the Raiders) to not make the same mistake again,” he said.
The rally comes in anticipation of a July 5 City Council meeting that will consider a resolution to put an advisory vote on the November ballot on the use of public funds to support a privately owned stadium and real estate development at Howard Terminal at the Port of Oakland.
At the Tuesday, July 5 meeting, the Council will discuss the measure and may ultimately take a final vote on placing it on the ballot. Public comment for this item will be taken at the beginning of the meeting.
In recent weeks, more than 4,000 Oakland residents have signed a petition in support of putting the measure on the November ballot.
Other speakers at the City Hall media event included James Vann, an advocate for affordable and homeless services.
“This is the people’s money, and the people should get to decide,” said Vann.
Civil rights attorney and activist Walter Riley said that Oakland A’s owner John Fisher is acting like a “corporate raider” who takes money out of the A’s instead of investing in his team.
Instead of giving a billion dollars to Fisher’s private development, the city should be investing in building and maintaining public parks and other infrastructure needs, he said.
Naomi Schiff, a housing activist, said, “The Howard Terminal deal keeps getting more expensive” for taxpayers. adding that the stadium at Howard Terminal would be built on a “inundation zone and liquification zone.”
The post Residents Demand Right to Vote on Use of Public Funds for A’s Stadium Project first appeared on Post News Group. This article originally appeared in Post News Group.
The post Residents Demand Right to Vote on Use of Public Funds for A’s Stadium Project first appeared on BlackPressUSA.